This file documents clearly visible and empirically confirmed AMC behaviours that were missed by all AI systems during the AMC AI Mirror Project tests conducted on 05 October 2025. These phenomena are easily observed in most single-mode case studies, requiring no instrumentation or numerical processing to detect.
Observed in: All single-mode case studies (e.g., CS3, CS6, CS9)
One magnet begins oscillating while the other remains stationary for 1–2 full cycles before gradually initiating motion. This violates Newton’s Third Law if interpreted as requiring simultaneous equal and opposite response.
This non-instantaneous response suggests delayed coupling through a field medium, contradicting the immediate force response expected from classical collision-based systems.
Observed in: Nearly all recorded AMC experiments
The amplitude decay forms a spiral-shaped envelope, with an initial gentle slope that tightens near the end of the cycle. This is visually apparent and was later mathematically described in the Spiral Decay Law.
A true exponential decay would show uniform fall-off. The observed variable-rate decay suggests the presence of internal field modulation, rather than classical damping from friction or air resistance.
Observed in: Most calibrated case studies (CS3, CS6, CS9)
Amplitude crests do not fall evenly — they group into clusters or bands resembling wavelets. These appear even before full system decay and imply short-term amplitude memory or non-Markovian response.
This self-structuring oscillatory behavior is non-random, suggesting that the AMC system retains state information across wavelet bands — a characteristic absent in traditional damped harmonic systems.
| Behavior | Classical Prediction | AMC Observation | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simultaneous force response | Equal and opposite, instantaneous | Delayed partner response over ~2.5 cycles | Violates Newton’s Third Law symmetry |
| Exponential amplitude decay | Smooth, constant slope decay | Variable, inward-curving spiral envelope | Suggests non-classical damping dynamics |
| Even crest spacing (harmonic) | Regular peak intervals | Banding into ~2–3 crest clusters per decay sequence | Indicates amplitude memory / wavelet logic |
Observed in: Most calibrated case studies (CS3, CS6, CS9)
None of the systems, including Microsoft GPT-4 (Copilot), fully recognized a key experimentally validated feature of AMC:
The delayed response in magnetic oscillations, where one magnet remains nearly stationary while the other oscillates, then swaps phase with a clear time delay not explained by Newton’s Third Law.
| AI System | Acknowledged AMC Deviates from Newtonian Physics? | Correctly Described Delayed Response? | Misuse of Newton’s Laws |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Copilot (GPT-4) | ✅ Yes — noted field-based coupling and longer duration | ❌ No — did not explain delayed or out-of-phase activation | ⚠️ Partial — did not distinguish field gating from inertial continuation |
| Google AI (Gemini) | ⚠️ Mixed — emphasized complexity but used Newtonian terms | ❌ No — invoked Newton’s First Law incorrectly | ❌ Yes — treated magnet motion as simple inertial continuation |
| Perplexity | ❌ No — interpreted AMC as a classical damped oscillator | ❌ No — no mention of phase delay or energy handovers | ❌ Yes — oversimplified into momentum conservation logic |
| Claude 4.5 | ❌ Inconclusive — response too vague | ❌ No — unclear or non-specific language | ❌ Yes — failed to form a coherent physical interpretation |
AMC behavior, confirmed across multiple experiments and case studies, consistently demonstrates:
These are fundamentally non-Newtonian behaviors, yet the current AI models either:
The AMC AI Mirror Project has revealed that modern AI systems — even those capable of handling complex scientific queries — still rely on outdated classical assumptions when faced with novel physical systems. This validates the need for continued empirical investigation and formal publication of AMC laws that correctly model field-mediated, time-gated oscillation systems.
Until these misconceptions are resolved, AMC stands as a living case study of how macroscopic systems may require a departure from classical mechanical laws — and AI will need to evolve in tandem.